With Net Neutrality, ISPs will rely on time and confusing language to slowly erode the internet.
But what is Net Neutrality all about? What do we stand to lose?
When the internet was first created, Net Neutrality was the unspoken standard. If you paid for internet, you could expect that you could go anywhere with the same speed. Of course, some sites were slower (bogged down with too many graphics or viruses), but for the most part, this meant that if you went to a website, it was going to load for you at a comparably similar speed to other sites like it.
Net Neutrality was penned to make this a spoken standard, as there were already providers who were determined to go against this. Most notoriously, BitTorrent was being so heavily throttled by Comcast that in some cases, it was entirely blocked. Additionally, the FCC ordered Comcast not to block certain programs (like Skype). This was because of the educational value of the internet: a vast and endless sea of information more easily accessible than any other time in human history.
The Supreme Court shot down both of these, but the FCC did not give up.
In 2010, the FCC released a set of rules that would come to be the Net Neutrality that we rely on, but with a huge caveat: while Comcast and the like could not throttle competitors, they could have multiple speed tiers set based on their own whims. This meant that mobile devices were given much slower internet speeds while being charged more for the privilege, as one example. This is important! We’ll talk about it in a later post today.
(This was done as Comcast, who owned Hulu, was attempting to throttle Netflix in an effort to make their own service look better in comparison)
In 2014, there was a belief that ‘narrowing’ Net Neutrality would be wise, and that one such allowance for businesses would be that they could charge for websites to use a “fast lane”. What this would mean is that if a site could pay the fee (unspecified), traffic to their site would be faster. Obviously not an issue for Google or Facebook, but for smaller startups it would directly impact their ability to compete. Public response was loud and critical, although in 2015 Republicans attempted to block the FCC’s ability to enforce Net Neutrality.
There’s a slew of situations where Net Neutrality was tested: Madison River Communications in 2005 blocked Vonage, AT&T warned users that wi-fi constituted as “theft of service”, Comcast blocked VPNs…all of these were things that Net Neutrality was able to squash.
Without anything to block them, you can guarantee that these same companies, now larger and more money-hungry, with more invested interest in controlling what you’re allowed to see, will try their hardest to censor and throttle the internet.
They’ll do it slowly, but they’ll still do it. Keep up the pressure on your politicians and don’t let this issue go away!
(Here’s the Wiki article: it’s a brief overview that goes into more detail than I did, with sources!)